Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MJ mohamed Iqbal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 14:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MJ mohamed Iqbal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of importance, just a branch manager. Effectively unsourced (as external links are not sources) The Banner talk 23:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only few claims to notability are in Author section, but those are all unsourced.--Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 00:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing significant on GS. SMIEEE does not quite help. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:49, 2 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete No indication of notability provided by current references or a Google search. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:30, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Not notable. Clearly fails WP:NOTABILITY. --Jersey92 (talk) 22:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. I'd be fine if that book written had an ISDN, but without it, no dice. Busy Moose (talk) 16:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete Web sources cannot decide a persons notabilityNm.imthiyas (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prove it. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:57, 6 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

I have updated few articles which was published in one of leading newspaper in UAE "Gulf Today", Check the link https://sites.google.com/site/mjmiqbal1/home/page2 Nm.imthiyas (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not Notable Drsharan (talk) 09:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.