This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaney talk 05:35, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
The ultimate in crystal-ball gamecruft. Zero Googles. ~~ N (t/c) 21:09, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Molotov (talk)
22:31, 14 September 2005 (UTC) - Delete. Concept is not notable (zero google), article admits no real game exist that suits this category. Provided link is broken. --Hurricane111 00:02, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy. Once the obviously inappropriate content (that is, the broken link and the prediction of future gaming trends) is removed, there's nothing left. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:39, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Is there a reason to drag this through Afd? Friday (talk) 01:17, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
- It doesn't fit any speedy criteria that I can see. However, see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Proposal/Non-notable Internet entities, inspired by this very article. ~~ N (t/c) 01:23, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable JoJan 15:52, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a notable concept, by the contributor's own statement. ♠ DanMS 03:24, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.