Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOON and 8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 00:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MOON and 8

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The more I look at this article, the more I'm convinced that it should be deleted. It is speculation, full of peacock terms, and might even be a hoax. I cannot find any reputable source that this film even exists. A prod was previously contested by the author. Bensci54 (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence that this film has reached principal photography stage so per WP:NFF we don't really need to consider anything else - ---- _nonsense ferret 23:58, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is zero coverage in reliable sources. Regardless of anything WP:NFF may say, it fails WP:GNG completely. -- 14:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per being TOO SOON. A sense of peacock would usually be a matter for regular editing and not be a deletion rationale. But what IS a valid rationale is this project is not yet spoken of in reliable sources. Until it is, it should not be back. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:18, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.