- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 16:23, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- MP3 Surround (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only reference is related to PS3 TML (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural keep and strong keep. AfD is not a cleanup task. Shame for the nominator, MP3 Surround is widely known if you care a bit about lossy audio compression, and its notability so easily verifiable that I don't know whether this nomination is due to ignorance or bad faith or what else. Nageh (talk) 22:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. One may think about merging the current content into a section of the MP3 article. Nageh (talk) 14:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - Keep - referenced and notable. Needs expansion, could possibly be merged into MP3, but absolutely not a candidate for deletion. Bienfuxia (talk) 06:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep With the references that have been added there is no reason to delete. Monty845 (talk) 08:19, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Clearly notable and sourced. Just needs cleanup. —SW— prattle 17:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. Notability is so easily verified that I am tempted to make a snide comment about smoking crack. Guy Macon (talk) 21:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.