- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 04:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt that this article meets Wikipedia:Notability requirements. There are no references and no external links. For all I know, it is entirely original research. Furthermore, the article is misleading, implying that the forged @msdn.com and @ms.com e-mail addresses are the actual source of the messages. —Remember the dot (talk) 22:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, this thing has been here for 3 1/2 years with no sources. Corvus cornix 22:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't doubt that the content is probably true, but "probably" isn't good enough. References are needed. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.