Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MYCROFT Enigma Code

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:G3 and WP:SNOW. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MYCROFT Enigma Code

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find a single source verifying this. Fram (talk) 08:05, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete as hoax. I'm pretty sure for one thing that this isn't how you set up an ULTRA/Enigma device. Mangoe (talk) 11:46, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete And even if sourced, one particular setting of this encrypation device does not warrant an article.TheLongTone (talk) 12:16, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:13, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:13, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Smells like a hoax: Mycroft for a German code? Even if it isn't, it's too trivial for a standalone article. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Enigma didn't operate on the basis of specialised codes: this is almost certainly a hoax. Nick-D (talk) 01:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.