Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MaD (Make a Difference)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MaD (Make a Difference)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a complete puffery piece. The lede reads like a mission statement and the whole thing is completely unsourced. Don't really feel confident about CSDing this under G11. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 09:21, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete evident WP:Conflict of interest by author, borderline WP:SPAM, no assertion of notability per WP:ORG. WP:PROMO tone could be scrubbed away, but it's not clear how much of value would remain. Scopecreep (talk) 09:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - advertisement and puffery that could possibly have been speedied as a G11. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Article's creator has been blocked as a spam account. Scopecreep (talk) 04:24, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.