- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 21:16, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete - WP is not a crystal ball Xorkl000 06:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete open and closed case of crystal ball.Wickethewok 06:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - I almost defended it... until I read it. Very crystalballish. "could quite possibly make Steve Jobs the richest man in the world" ---J.Smith 06:22, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Royboycrashfan
06:22, 7 March 2006 (UTC) - Delete -- Speculative, unverifiable. --Mysidia (talk) 07:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I don't even think its possible, needs some SSE3 thingy-ma-bobber or some other crap but either way this is orignal research, a theory, and a prediction all of which do not belong here. Try Google's new webpage service. Mike (T C)
07:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- What? There are AMD CPUs that implement SSE3 (Venice and San Diego cores for instance) and even if there were not you can get away with only SSE2 with some modifications. Not that any of that matters, as I'm quite sure if Apple wanted to have OSX run on AMD chips they could make it happen. kotepho 14:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete WP isn't a crystal ball. --MaNeMeBasat 15:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. —-- That Guy, From That Show! (talk) 2006-03-08 03:01Z
- Delete NOR, crystal ball, POV, I could go on kotepho 14:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.