- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, no reliable sources Wackymacs 16:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete per nom and WP:CORP, unless reliable third-party sources can be provided to establish its notability. Walton monarchist89 17:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 04:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Small company only existed ~1 year before merging into another and no notable results after that are asserted. The one product with asserted notability (UpdateWasher) has a single ref, and that is to an article that neither comments extensively on the item nor gives it especially high ratings. It's a product-roundup article whose inclusion criteria are broad: "When I first started looking at the various tweaking utilities, I downloaded each one that I found" and the item is not listed in the "recommended" category. DMacks 06:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:CORP. MER-C 12:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.