- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Mac VerStandig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Blogger & former college-newspaper-editor bio fails WP:BIO#Primary_criterion_for_Notability_of_people: has not "been the subject of secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject", and is not a special case; no secondary-source Google hits; possible WP:COI, whether WP:COI#Self-promotion or WP:COI#Close_relationships --Rrburke(talk) 14:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, one claim to notability is watered down as a decision of his colleagues on the editorial board, which means he himself is not notable. I think you'd have to do something extraordinary as a college newspaper editor to be notable, and that isn't enough (particularly since it was a "protest" similarly echoed elsewhere). --Dhartung | Talk 04:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Editor of a student newspaper who never did anything notable seems to fail WP:BIO. PaddyM 03:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.