Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macarthur Disability Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Macarthur Disability Services

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Macarthur Disability Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG, no significant coverage. The coverage provided includes local newspapers, as per WP:AUD, wider coverage is required. LibStar (talk) 23:36, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Had a look, also couldn't find any significant coverage. There is some non-significant coverage from The Daily Telegraph (Sydney), but I don't think that's a reliable source anyway, per the article about it --Tristario (talk) 23:53, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability, Organizations, and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 23:57, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.