- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 21:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Article appears to make no assertion of notability or of reliable sources discussing this MUD. JavaTenor 18:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No assertions of notability, nor could any sources be found which might qualify this for inclusion. Aside from two edits by User:Dflax@yahoo.com and the original IP editor (both of which have a combined total of less than ten edits), all edits to the page have been automated or procedural clean up edits. As far as I can tell, it also meets the CSD categories for G11 (Blatant Advertising), A7 (Unremarkable web content). Cheers, Lanky TALK 15:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 19:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. No assertion of notability. - Nabla 13:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.