- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkativerata (talk) 20:36, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Made.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
advertising for made.com instead of making an article about it. Thebestofall007 (talk) 18:38, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rather neutral descriptions and factual with some quoted references. If considered unsuited please suggest how to change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninglimade (talk • contribs) 18:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedia:Spam. When I searched Google and Yahoo, I only found one mention here. Anybody else is welcome to dig for some more sources if they can find any. SwisterTwister talk 23:55, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable company. Literally nothing found at Google News Archive. --MelanieN (talk) 22:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.