Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Made2Manage Systems
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity, NN CORP, Sleepyhead is related to the organization Justdoingmyjob 18:11, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Some ERP company Nothingpersonal 18:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep as this appears to be a bad-faith nomination involving multiple sockpuppet accounts. Notice how strange the history of the article is during the addition of the AfD notice: no less than two new accounts and one IP worked together to properly create the AfD notice. (five edits from here to here). "Just doing my job, nothing personal" is a transparent pair of socks, and the implication is that someone was hired to get this article removed from Wikipedia. Also notice this edit and this edit made to the AfD of a competing company (also brimming with sockpuppets), after which the same accounts nominated this article for deletion. Note that I will happily cast my vote based on the merits of the article when sockpuppets aren't crawling all over it. — Saxifrage ✎ 18:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KeepMerge with Onxy Software. Press coverage at [1], [2], [3],[4] satisfied WP:CORP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Keep. If it's big enough to buy publicly-listed companies like Onyx Software Corporation, and it's getting press coverage like Ohnoitsjamie listed above, it's notable enough to keep. Kickaha Ota 23:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I've merged in the information on Onyx Software Corporation as discussed in the Onyx AfD, and rewritten the rest of the M2M article a bit.Kickaha Ota 00:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC) I've also tried to add more details on the acquisition spree that has made it notable in the last few years. Kickaha Ota 16:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep I'll say that I think there's enough coverage to keep the article for now under the current standards, but I really think Wikipedia needs a tougher standard for these corporations. --Targetter (Lock On) 23:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - passes WP:CORP although the article could use some additional tidying. -- Whpq 15:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.