- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 02:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Made in London (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Do not feel this article meets notability criteria. The band have received no significant coverage as far as I can tell, either now or when they were supposedly active, and the fact that they have disbanded indicates this situation is unlikely to change. carelesshx talk 03:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete A7, non-notable band, so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Keep didn't catch that, they have charted a hit, which would satisfy at least one criterion of WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per WP:MUSIC#Criteria for musicians and ensembles. Has a charted (#15) hit in the UK. Needs sourcing. I've removed the speedy. - Rjd0060 03:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know if this is sufficient, but it is verification for now. - Rjd0060 03:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Rjd0060. --Brewcrewer 04:36, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per User:Rjd0060 Doc Strange 15:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per Rjd.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 06:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.