- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:45, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Magic Camera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software; I haven't found any secondary source coverage. Also written like an ad. Mr. Vernon (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I have examined the first 30 hits obtained on a Google search for "Magic Camera", and likewise the first 30 hits on a search for "Magic Camera" shiningmorning, to make sure everything is about this software. In both cases I got nothing at all except for the company's own website plus sites offering the software for download. Likewise the "references" given in the article are (1) a link to the company's own site and (2) a link to the Wine site, which indicates nothing except that someone has tried to run the software under Linux with partial success, and has decided to report the fact on the Wine site. In short, there is no evidence, either in the article or anywhere else, of any third party coverage at all. Definitely not notable in Wikipedia's sense. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:51, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - lots of links to download sites but I can't find any coverage about the software. -- Whpq (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.