Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic MP3 Tagger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 04:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Advert for non-notable software. AlistairMcMillan 22:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:SOFTWARE. SM247^{My Talk} 00:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:SOFTWARE. Notable software because listed on: dmoz.org, musicbrainz.org, download.com, tucows.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.124.233.26 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 2 July 2006

Did you mean to vote Keep? AlistairMcMillan 14:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I do. Emkey08 19:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thousands of pieces of software are listed at sites like dmoz.org or download.com. Please explain what makes this piece of software notable? AlistairMcMillan 20:13, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I may quote the official Wikipedia guidelines at WP:SOFTWARE? For publications that mention the software while not being specifically about them, and for publications of lower profile (such as a local newspaper or an e-zine), multiple such works are needed. Which are the ones mentioned above, plus id3.org, netzwelt.de, softpedia.com and others Emkey08 12:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Software directories like download.com, softpedia.com etc are not publications. By publications we mean magazines, newspapers, books etc. AlistairMcMillan 17:13, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So then, if it makes you happy, delete this site. But don't forget to keep an neutral point of view when removing software that competes with Musicmatch. Emkey08 19:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Even if it's shareware, this is an advertisement for a profit-making product. - Richardcavell 00:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.