Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnum Heat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 23:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Magnum Heat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Declined a speedy on this because I couldn't find a good criteria to delete it under (it's not online from the indications therein, it's not a person, it's not a group, it's not vandalism, and it doesn't read like advertising), and we don't have a {{db|IAR}} tag hanging around anywhere. This is a homemade film, no sources, no notability, no nothing. Delete, and if someone comes up with a category it fits in, make that a speedy. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No assertion of notability. TheMolecularMan (talk) 22:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable, unsourced, home movie. (And having a CSD category for "unremarkable videos" would be handy indeed.)    SIS  22:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete — No evidence of notability and no sources. macy 23:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable, unsourced. Agree with User:Strikeout_Sister. Paste (talk) 18:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A lack of sources or assertions of notability are not reasons to delete an article. However, I cannot myself find WP:RS to prove any notabiity. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: A non-notable home movie. Schuym1 (talk) 13:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - it's snowing in here. Bearian (talk) 18:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• delete Its some kind of maths ;) not notable+no sources=no article ;) abf /talk to me/ 19:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.