Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mailai Sapthaswarangal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nja²⁴⁷ 08:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mailai Sapthaswarangal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD declined by sole significant contributor. My concern is that I could find no secondary sources (gnews, gscholar, etc. turned up zip), and hence fails WP:V and WP:ORG. Based on the existence of its website, the school appears to exist, but .... Ray^Talk 13:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 16:32, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 16:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's not a degree granting institution and there's nothing at all in searches to even verify anything about, let alone show notability for the organization. -SpacemanSpiff 18:43, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Is there another spelling of its name that could be searched? Perhaps there is more than one valid transliteration of this name. Can someone who reads the working language of this institution do a search for it in that language? I am doubtful that notability can be established, but I don't have the language skills to do these searches myself. -- Eastmain (talk) 23:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I did a search in Tamil (மைலை சப்தஸ்வரங்கள்) before !voting above. Note that you'll get a lot of hits for "சப்தஸ்வரங்கள்" because that just means "seven notes". -SpacemanSpiff 17:57, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.