- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. NSLE (T+C+CVU) 00:45, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
useless list see Talk:Dancemania. --- Melaen 00:15, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, listcruft with bad title Snurks T C 02:02, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. We don't need two lists for the same thing. Movementarian 02:41, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per the above. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 03:25, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a very helpful article. (Bjorn Tipling 07:15, 11 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]
- Delete. We have seen plenty of useless, pointless lists pass through AFD, but this really scrapes the bottom of the barrel. •DanMS 08:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, utterly useless list, badly titled. — JIP | Talk 11:56, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 20:02, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete list of quite breathtaking pointlessness. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 22:53, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Eloquently expressed, Guy: “breathtaking pointlessness.” Mind if I use that phrase occasionally? (with proper attribution, of course) •DanMS 00:28, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Main sequence. Gazpacho 23:03, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; Spucatum tauri. Celcius 20:16, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.