Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makesbridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Makesbridge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software fails the GNG. No coverage whatsoever in any reliable sources. Speedy deleted in 2014 as G11. schetm (talk) 18:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. No coverage. NickCT (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent sources. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:23, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability,Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 22:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Orduin ^Discuss 23:46, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.