- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Makeself (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 19:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is a utility to create self-extracting scripts for software installations on Linux systems. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:54, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete apparent lack of secondary source coverage. Gigs (talk) 20:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, this is probably the most widely used software to create self-extracting archives on Linux, used by the Google Earth installer, the Nvidia installer, and many other projects. I know there is not many coverage, but... did you honestly expect coverage of a CLI tool used mainly by (Linux) software developers? --SF007 (talk) 17:35, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If it has no coverage, it should be deleted. Joe Chill (talk) 19:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Like I said, this kind of software does not really get lots of reviews due to its very nature. I feel there is no strong reason for deletion given the popularity of this tool --SF007 (talk) 20:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a strong reason. It fails WP:N and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Joe Chill (talk) 20:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Like I said, this kind of software does not really get lots of reviews due to its very nature. I feel there is no strong reason for deletion given the popularity of this tool --SF007 (talk) 20:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If it has no coverage, it should be deleted. Joe Chill (talk) 19:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.