- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted (CSD G11 and G12) by Orangemike. NAC. Cliff smith talk 05:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Making A Poem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Whatever can be said about the poem is already said on the page about the author, Vihang A Naik, which is also an AfD. Article as it stands is in no way objective and appears to be written by the author himself--and perhaps added to Wikipedia by author. Drmies (talk) 01:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Wikipedia does not list books and this should be moved to Wikisource. - ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 08:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article is one big POV violation and the subject is unlikely to be noteworthy to start with. - Mgm|(talk) 10:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Seems non-notable and reads like an advertisement. Kafka Liz (talk) 10:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Poetry Delete the history as it fails WP:N and set it up as a redirect. It's a viable search term.
- Delete Agreed that Vihang A Naik covers all that needs be said, and this reads like an ad. The redirect sounds like a good idea too. Firebat08 (talk) 00:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.