Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Making Jack Falcone
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Materialscientist (talk) 04:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Making Jack Falcone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFF. Possibly based on speculation from out of date news sources. In any case, not verifiable and fails WP:GNG Rob Sinden (talk) 15:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I found this from 2008 and this from 2010. --Rob Sinden (talk) 16:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as part of a wave of hoax articles submitted by this user. Lugnuts (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:V and WP:N. As the nominator wrote, "possibly based on speculation from out of date news sources".--Cavarrone (talk) 20:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As far as I can tell, Making Jack Falcone appears to be the film equivalent of vaporware. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 01:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.