Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaria Control Project
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Malaria Control Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completing nomination for 69.181.249.92, nomination is as follows: Prod contested by person who works for the project. It's still an unreferenced article about non-notable software. I have no opinion. Hut 8.5 09:43, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is no reason why this article should be deleted. It is, however, wrongly named. a move request to "malariacontrol.net" is pending.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Malariologist (talk • contribs)
- I think this debate here can be considered to cover the article no matter where it gets moved to. ErikHaugen (talk) 18:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per WP:COPYVIO of http://www.malariacontrol.net/impressum.php. Additionally, the article states that malariacontrol.net is currently in production. http://africa-at-home.web.cern.ch/africa-at-home/malariacontrol.html states that the "MalariaControl.net application will complete in a few months". I recommend delete per WP:COPYVIO and WP:CRYSTAL. Cindamuse (talk) 10:33, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sources I found either don't significantly cover the subject or are affiliated (not independent) with @home/boinc, so it seems to fail to meet the general notability guidelines which require significant coverage in independent sources for inclusion in Wikipedia. ErikHaugen (talk) 18:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The fact that the prod was removed by someone affiliated is not relevant to this debate. ErikHaugen (talk) 18:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.