- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 21:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ManTwitty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable blog per WP:WEB, unreferenced. MuffledThud (talk) 10:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 10:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There isn't anything to support the blog being WP:N in its field. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to Manchester City F.C.. Steven Walling 05:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 01:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 02:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A non-notable blog. No media coverage, etc. There are thousands of blogs like this, so why does this particluar one warrant an article? No case is made for notability coeliacus. (talk.) 03:30, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, has no sources, makes no claim of notability. Abductive (reasoning) 10:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.