- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Just about scrapes into WP:MUSIC. Black Kite 23:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Man Bites God (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:Band & WP:N guidelines. Per article, they are unsigned. -- Endlessdan 18:42, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- I agree that they fail WP:BAND and WP:N. Reyk YO! 00:40, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 05:15, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 08:51, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete Fails WP:N and WP:BAND, gsearching pulls up quite a few links, but not to any site that is reliable. --Ged UK (talk) 19:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article seems to be a promotional exercise to promote a non-notable band.--Lester 22:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep With reference to WP:BAND, these three articles, all in reliable secondary sources, appear to go at least part-way to meeting criteria #1. Google News confirms they have played in Melbourne, Adelaide and Sydney, as well as the Edinburgh Festival, which would appear to provide claims regarding criteria #4. Murtoa (talk) 03:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with your assessments, and as such I have added some more "reliable" sources to Man Bites God's wikipedia page in the hope that you will reconsider this deletion. --Newmillennium (talk) 08:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment No idea why Newmillennium added 'kelly clarkson' to my comment, I've removed it. --Ged UK (talk) 08:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Changed opinion with addition of new sources. Appears to now meet criterion 4 around touring and possibly criterion 10 around performing theme tune for TV show. --Ged UK (talk) 08:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per sources in major newspapers located by User:Murtoa, band meets the WP:N criteria due to coverage in reliable third-party sources. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.