- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod, removed without comment. Little more than a dictionary definition cited to Urban Dictionary. Already transwikied. Serpent's Choice 05:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not really expandable, this is leaking into the media but few real treatments of the term, just drive-bys. --Dhartung | Talk 09:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Reminds me of that one Seinfeld where George develops a friendship with some guy and Jerry describes it as a "non-sexual crush" at one point. Delete as neologism, although I could reasonably see this being a redirect to Platonic love or something. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to male bonding to discourage recreation. Placeholder account 03:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.