Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man with the Action Hair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chuck Mosley. The !voters say that there WP:MUSTBESOURCES, but failed to show them. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 15:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Man with the Action Hair

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like this fits {{Db-a9}} as this article does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject, and the artist does not have an article but it was reverted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cement (Cement album) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 02:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. We probably should have an article on Cement (band) as the amount found from a Google search is bordering on enough (bio and 2 reviews at Allmusic, various other sources discussing the band as part of Mosley's career) and there will surely be print coverage from the era, but even if it's covered within the Chuck Mosley article, that should be enough to make an A9 deletion for the album articles invalid. Looking at the two album articles, though, there's barely anything there beyond an infobox and tracklisting for each. In this case a redirect to Chuck Mosley would seem appropriate unless further coverage can be found (it probably does exist - print coverage from 1994 isn't well represented online). --Michig (talk) 20:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and trout the nominator for determinedly ignoring the language of A9. Cement is a side project of a notable artist whose other albums, solo and with groups, typically have articles. The case for deletion simply isn't made; the nominator has failed to comply with WP:BEFORE and bases his argument on the current condition of the article rather than the subject's actual notability, which is contrary to deletion policy. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 16:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: and @Michig: Notability isn't inherited, so if an article on an album by a band which is a redirect to an artist which is notable (primarily for his work with another band) is to exist here, then it has to have sources which establish its independent notability. This does not. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Chuck Mosley. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:44, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.