Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Management in Bhagavad Gita

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as a copyright violation. Yunshui 雲‍水 07:36, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Management in Bhagavad Gita

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unencyclopedic essay; an earlier prod was removed by the creator. This has the appearance of a copy&paste, but I don't think it is -- I think it was constructed by copying material from several web pages and reorganizing it -- some sentences at least are reproduced nearly verbatim though. The main point, however, is that this is not encyclopedic and can't be made encyclopedic without being rewritten from scratch. The topic may form the basis of a valid article, but it wouldn't have any resemblance to this one. Looie496 (talk) 16:08, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If this is not a close paraphrase of other sources (although one of the links didn't work for me, so I can't verify this), then it is original research. It seems to me that even if the subject were to be notable, this would need to be rewritten from scratch, as mentioned in the nomination. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 18:25, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I can't give the reasons better that Looie496 and Phantomsteve have. I don't think it's a copy & paste, because of the statements of the author, but I do think it's NN and OR. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 23:08, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:43, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:43, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete copyvio. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:34, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.