- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - classic vanity entry - creator/main contributor's only edits are to this article and to associated articles to insert a link to this page; incorrect format (since they have never edited another article, they have no idea what the correct format is); weak assertion of notability (profiled on a program that doesn't have an article on a network without an article); overuse of bolding; a picture that could probably only come from the subject's private photo collection. No explanation of what the "Executive Fellowship Program" is, but I suspect it is nothing more than an internship. I highly doubt that someone straight out of college is moving into a powerful position in the California executive--Nobunaga24 03:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete main claim to notability is crystal ball soon to be featured Dlyons493 Talk 03:43, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of WP:RS indicating that individual meets WP:BIO. --Kinu t/c 03:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable, accodring to edit history contains copyvio also. Dinosaur puppy 03:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as vanity --Xrblsnggt 04:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as vanity -- rhmoore 06:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable. Employment with Arnie no more than a summer job- the title says so. All the other jobs look to be low grade or internships. I suspect it could be challenged under WP:AUTO too (created by Lebo-americano, which fits her description of 'Lebanese born American'). Ohconfucius 15:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable, vanity. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Notice to administrators - this should actually be speedy. I just found out this has been deleted 4 times before [1], therefore recreation of deleted material.--Nobunaga24 23:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Unfortunately, it's never been deleted by an XfD process before (all are speedies), so it can't be G4'ed, even though the outcome is somewhat obvious (knocks on wood). Semirelatedly, I would suggest protection if this AfD closes with a consensus to delete, as creation of this page seems to be quite frequent. --Kinu t/c 04:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.