Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manhattan Time Service

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus DGG ( talk ) 10:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manhattan Time Service

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article lacking references/in-depth coverage in independent RS. Some of the references given don't even mention subject. Fails WP:NCORP MB 04:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not pass WP:GNG. As the nominator said, some of the sources don't mention the subject. --Mhhossein ^talk 15:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to find sources. this for example, doesn't mention the subject. Neither does this NYDailyNews. I guess this can be deleted. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Exactly one significant reference, and I'm not sure about the WP:RS status of even that. Were there more than business listings etc. to sustain the article, it might be worth going to RSN but as it is, there aren't multiple sources so that's moot. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.