Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manitoba Provincial Nomination Program PNP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Manitoba Provincial Nomination Program PNP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability (WP:GNG), reads like a WP:HOWTO and an advertisement for the program, probably with liberal application of copypaste.  Sandstein  05:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- I've made some improvements and found some references which could go some way to indicate notability. I think the article could definitely be improved with some more rewording, and expanded to further prove notability and move it away form a WP:HOWTO. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 22:23, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Part of the problem is that the article is mis-named, I believe. Looks like it should be "Provincial Nominee Program for Business," which yields a few Gnews hits, too. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:18, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.