- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 05:34, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Does not seem sufficiently notable. Only a few hundred Google hits, which is a pretty good indication for something game-related. Superm401 | Talk 04:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article content suggests vanity. If this extremely brief material is encyclopedic, could in not be included in Warcraft III? ~ Jeff Q (talk) 05:05, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Vanity, HackJandy 05:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Don't waste time on it. It says itself its vanity. Can we use WP:XD on it? Zordrac 08:00, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article being used for personal messages.Bjones 13:59, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Did someone other than the authors actually edit it and add the stub notice? I'm sorry: I should applaud such wikilove, but this is graffiti: personal boasts and slams. Geogre 18:20, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity. RasputinAXP talk contribs 22:04, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.