Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Patil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manoj Patil

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Manoj Patil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost entirely unsourced BLP; I have gone through the article history to see if there has been any useful content and/or sources, and I have done a WP:BEFORE search for sources as well. I cannot find any sources that indicate that he meets WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. He won one part of a bodybuilding contest in 2016, and that's pretty much all I can find, apart from some interviews where he plugs a company selling some kind of high-protein food. It is clear that there has been some promotional efforts going on – the article was created by an account that has since been blocked for UPE, and another account has been adding advert type language more recently. bonadea contributions talk 18:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 18:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 18:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 18:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above. Before stubbing this was a G11 case. buidhe 22:13, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The only sourcing is affiliated, either to the subject, or to the organisation that gave him an award - not notable. GirthSummit _(blether) 12:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.