Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manpon (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, previously deleted per afd & copy vio. Ѕandahl ♥ 22:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Manpon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Lots of ghits, but none in the first half dozen pages use the term in this way. The original source in the article went to a wiki mirror; the current source does not appear to be much more reliable. Prod contested by IP user with no comment. Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and precedent from previous AfDs. GlassCobra 13:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per GlassCobra. Basement12 (T.C) 15:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per CSD G4 - recreation of deleted material, as the evidence of this page indicates it is exactly the same content. (It was flagged as a copyvio of that page at WP:SCV) – Toon(talk) 21:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Good catch. The deletion discussion was here -- I missed it because of the final "s".
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.