- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Mantofight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find anything particularly notable about this company and none of the article's references, which seem to lack independence, seem to show notability. Article has been tagged for notability for two years so I decided to bring it to AfD. I don't have strong feelings on this, but I thought it would be good to get a consensus opinion on this article (and perhaps some better sourcing). Papaursa (talk) 17:43, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Papaursa (talk) 17:43, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:SPAM, no reliable references, unnotable. Maashatra11 (talk) 09:28, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with both of the above comments. This seems more like an ad than an article. Astudent0 (talk) 20:36, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.