Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manufacturing 2.0
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Manufacturing 2.0 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. Artw 04:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nominator's reasons. —tregoweth (talk) 04:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, WP:N, WP:NOT. --Bfigura (talk) 06:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Article fails to provide independent evidience of notability. --Gavin Collins 08:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 2.0, non-notable neologism. JIP | Talk 10:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (but I'm the author). If you search on the web, you'll see it being used in my industry quite often now (vendors, analysts, articles), but regardless this is being used heavily. Sorry, I'm a newbie so I'm not sure how to "debate" my item being deleted. Also, didn't 'web 2.0' start as a neologism at one point? Mikepants, 9 September 2007. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikepants (talk • contribs) 17:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.