Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mapusoft Technologies
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 17:41, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Mapusoft Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources, and based on promotion of the "nest big thing". Wiki is not speculative source and seems to violate: WP:NOTADVERTISING#ADVERTISING Tyros1972 Talk 11:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Advertising. I notice that this user previously posted Mapusoft which was speedied per G11 and A7 - this article should meet the same fate for the same reason. andy (talk) 15:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The company plainly exists but there is no evidence of it meeting the WP:CORPDEPTH notability guidelines. AllyD (talk) 18:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per CORP; does not meet N or GNG. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 12:14, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.