- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 02:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Marc Ellison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has no first class, list-A or Twenty20 experiences, CricInfo lists one FC match however CA (the more reliable of the two) records it not as a FC match. According to WP:CRIN, U-19 matches alone don't indicate notability, nor do Otago 'A' matches. Freelance writers for CricInfo also don't suggest notability. Author declined a PROD under WP:GNG however after discussion at WT:CRIC I've decided to bring to AfD for consensus. SGGH ping! 12:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Notified User:XLerate as he removed the PROD. SGGH ping! 12:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cricinfo doesn't list any First-class matches for him, maybe you are getting confused with Basanta Regmi? Harrias (talk) 12:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes you're right. Juggling two Afds at once. SGGH ping! 12:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, agree with SGGH reasoning above, fails WP:CRIN, and I don't believe that his U19, Otago 'A' matches, or writing on Cricinfo confers him with enough notability. Harrias (talk) 12:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. By our current WP:CRIN notability guidelines, this one falls short of the requirements.—MDCollins (talk) 16:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom. Johnlp (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.