Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marine Biology Simulation Case Study

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to AP Computer Science. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marine Biology Simulation Case Study (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable examination material  M2Ys4U ^(talk) 15:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to GridWorld. From a quick search, I see multiple books and peer-reviewed articles that would definitely meet WP:V and WP:N. While notability is not temporary & this could probably survive an AfD with a keep, I believe that it would be better-suited in the context of the current case study. --Karnesky (talk) 18:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastor Theo (talk) 00:09, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge both articles to the article on the exam--not notable separately, and the new one is not more notable than the old. DGG (talk) 04:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to AP Computer Science. Lack of third-party independent sources means the subject is not notable by itself. -Atmoz (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.