Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Hoops 3-on-3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate wasSpeedy keep due to the nomination, in my determination, to be not in good faith. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non Notable Video Game Petunialover 18:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Looks to be as notable as any other game in the franchise. Tevildo 18:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep. Video game from a major publisher, based on an extremely notable franchise. Also : even though game has not been released, this is not crystalballism, due to the E3 demo ... but that's not the nominator's point, anyway. Suspect bad-faith nomination. -- Docether 18:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep. Extremely notable game in development by Square Enix, approved of by Nintendo, in the Mario franchise and on the Nintendo DS. - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  In addition, the AfDer is a new user and his only activity on Wikipedia is this AfD. - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep, bad-faith nom. hateless 18:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep It's a Mario game. Of course it's notable. Enough information is available that it doesn't violate crystal ball, either. Ace of Sevens 23:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep What the heck isn't notable about it? --HeroicJay 04:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.