Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Filby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted as promotional (CV). Peridon (talk) 12:12, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Filby

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I fail to see the purpose ot significance of this article. Tco03displays (talk) 00:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy delete~~ Strong speedy delete WP:CSD#g11. No assertion of notability. no sourcing and promotional. Reads like a curriculum vitae. Dloh cierekim 00:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this is my first post and a work in progress. Mark is a Promoter and has done great work with many Charities. Hopefully this will bring awareness to these great causes.PJ2075 —Preceding undated comment added 02:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Though not so active as once I was, I see part of my admin role as coaching new users. To "bring awareness to . . . great causes," is not Wikipedia's role. This is exactly why we feel the article must be deleted. If you wish to be an editor at Wikipedia, you might start by reading WP:42 and WP:Soap. Thanks, Dloh cierekim 22:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A7 actual person with no assertion of notability. EricSerge (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Someone appears to have put their own CV up on Wikipedia. He also appears to have deleted the AFD once. And no, the above comment from the article writer doesn't help. Neonchameleon (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete As aforementioned, it seems like someone did post their CV. Based on the article as it is, the person is not notable by Wikipedia's standards, despite how notable his charities might be. TCMemoire (talk) 06:06, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A7 and G11 - no indication of notability (well, WP:TLDR, but nothing leaped off the page) and just a CV dumped into an encyclopedia. PamD 09:12, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.