Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Perlman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Perlman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP article unsourced and therefore information could not be verified Fresh Sullivan (talk) 00:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. These entries here and here confirm he is an NFL official and helps with the BLP issue, but I don't know whether he satisfied WP:GNG. This one here may have bearing on GNG. Cbl62 (talk) 03:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not finding anything that would pass WP:GNG or any other notability guideline.--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to the sources User:Cbl62 found, I found that he is in the Toms River, New Jersey, Hall of Fame [1] (don't you wish your hometown had a hall of fame?) Unless someone finds something bigger than this, delete and/or add him to List of NFL officials - if such a thing exists.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Multiple News searches found results for him but nothing significant or notable. SwisterTwister talk 06:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.