- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Marqed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I totally fail to see the notability of this piece of software, but the article's autor - who happens to be the developer - deprodded the article. De728631 (talk) 20:03, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable software, and the article itself is very poor. LoudHowie (talk) 22:28, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete actually this is apparently web content, and fails that test as well: It was founded in August 2009.... - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 18:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find any coverage of this software in any reliable sources. Fails the notability test. Transmissionelement (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.