Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Jacoby (composer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:07, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Jacoby (composer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable composer. Can't find any independent sources, reliable or otherwise. PRODded by @McGeddon as "Fails WP:BASIC with no in-depth secondary sources"; PROD removed by an IP with the rather bizarre explanation that it's "too early in career for secondary sources". Kolbasz (talk) 05:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 05:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 05:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Hardly much to suggest a better article for the applicable notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 08:15, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A standard google search gives a lot of relevant results which I'm looking through to. try and find reliable sources.217.43.20.238 (talk) 12:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Couldn't find any reliable sources87.112.91.203 (talk) 19:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:COMPOSER. I couldn't locate and secondary reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG. It also appears that this composer fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:COMPOSER as well. Even if this person did manage to skid past those guidelines, WP:GNG is where the trail ends. There must be significant coverage in secondary reliable sources in order to establish notability of a subject, and I'm just not finding any. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.