- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Martin Robitsch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to fail WP:BIO. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Definately not notable, smells like an ad too. Letsdrinktea (talk) 03:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 05:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: It smells like the sort promotional autobiography that you would legitimately submit for inclusion in a business directory, which Wikipedia is not. The only thing here that begins to show notability is the award and I don't think that is enough. Referenced only to primary sources and I am not seeing RS coverage in Google, just social networking and blogs. --DanielRigal (talk) 10:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. Yellowweasel (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm finding it hard to track down that award. According to info I've found, the 2007 winner was Gert-Jan van Breugel http://www.floov.net/index.php?id=en&sec=100&sub=48&pag=1 I can't access the Dyson page, as it insists on using Flash (and I refuse). Perhaps someone else can get in there and check this. Searching for the award and the surname gives me 0 hits. Peridon (talk) 21:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.