- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 17:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Maslow window (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable and unencyclopaedic essay based mostly on self-published sources. The second paragraph is almost entirely WP:CRYSTAL. W. D. Graham 07:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete I think I've heard of this, but I can't find reliable references in mainstream sources. The current article is not great, with a lot of hypothesis about permanent moon bases and a lack of basic information, e.g. who Maslow was. I'm willing to change my mind given better references, but faced with the poor current state of this article and the apparent lack of mainstream coverage, deletion without prejudice seems the best option. It might be possible to redirect this, because there are other somewhat similar cyclical theories like Kondratiev wave and Grand supercycle, but I'm not sure of the best target. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. All I can find on this by way of sources is authored by the inventor of the concept, Bruce M. Cordell. The quality of the article is such that even if the topic was notable (for which I can't find any evidence), the best would nevertheless be to discard this and start over. --Lambiam 22:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.