Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masstubarc Biomass Engine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:02, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, original research and/or independently unverifiable. Zero hits. Part of a series of related Tubarc articles[1]. Also possible self-promotion. Regforafd 01:00, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom dr.alf 01:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Tubarcruft. Ifnord 04:48, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all of them. Smerdis of Tlön 20:00, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per my comments about tubarc. ManoaChild 21:13, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom, and this seems to violate several principles of thermodynamics. Not quite a perpetual motion machine, but "...convert nearly all chemical bonding energy of the biomass to mechanical rotating energy..." and "The energy released from the liquid or solid fuel should provide near the same rotating power..." are quite startling claims. CarbonCopy 21:21, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tubarc Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 22:51, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteTheRingess 23:21, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
See Also
Discussion consolidated under Tubarc CarbonCopy 18:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.