Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mastadex Hero Editor
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. Angr/talk 21:42, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am not quite sure why the VfD tag was put up with no explanation. If I don't hear any complaints, I'll just take the VfD notice down. Chotchki 20:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The anon's edit summary said "NPOV violation, obvious advertisment". The first isn't a reason for deletion, of course, but the second certainly is. Delete. —Cryptic (talk) 14:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wow, a cheat program. Which aren't notable unless they involve some serious groundbreaking reverse-engineering wizardry, or perhaps a massive lawsuit... and even then they're better described in the articles of the game itself. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 10:19, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep 1) If this is an advertisement, why aren't all entries for Diablo itself? And all other entries for computer programs for that matter? 2) As a wikipedia user and beginning Diablo player who knows next to nothing about editing characters, I actually found this article useful and informative. Lawyer2b 06:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I find this article both useful and notable, even though it's nature may not be liked by some, we can't deny it's existence. - Discombobulatortalk 14:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is no where near WP:SOFTWARE were it policy. I do miss Jamella's though. kotepho 14:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.